TRA CỨU
Tài liệu in
Skip Navigation Links.
Tài liệu đa phương tiện
Skip Navigation Links.
thông tin biểu ghi
  • Luận văn
  • Ký hiệu PL/XG: 418.0071 NGU
    Nhan đề: EXPLORING THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN PARAGRAPH WRITING BY PRE-INTERMEDIATE EFL STUDENTS AT SOME LANGUAGE CENTERS IN VIETNAM :
DDC 418.0071
Tác giả CN Nguyễn, Quốc Tuấn
Tác giả TT Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Huế
Nhan đề EXPLORING THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN PARAGRAPH WRITING BY PRE-INTERMEDIATE EFL STUDENTS AT SOME LANGUAGE CENTERS IN VIETNAM :KHÁM PHÁ CÁCH SỬ DỤNG PHƯƠNG TIỆN LIÊN KẾT TRONG VIẾT ĐOẠN VĂN BỞI HỌC VIÊN HỌC TIẾNG ANH NHƯ NGÔN NGỮ NƯỚC NGOÀI Ở CẤP ĐỘ TIỀN TRUNG CẤP Ở MỘT SỐ TRUNG TÂM TIẾNG ANH Ở VIỆT NAM /Nguyễn Quốc Tuấn; Nguyễn Thị Bảo Trang
Thông tin xuất bản Huế,2021
Mô tả vật lý 90tr. ;28cm.
Tóm tắt This research explores Vietnamese ELF pre-intermediate students’ use of cohesive devices in paragraph writing and the problems students faced while using these devices. Eighty Vietnamese EFL learners in four English classes in two English centers in Vietnam each wrote five paragraphs about five different topics via learning blogs. In total, 400 paragraphs were collected. The analysis of this research was based of Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) cohesion taxonomy to identify cohesive devices students used and the problems in using these devices. Besides, the framework of error analysis by Ellis and Barkhuizen (2005) was also used to analyze the errors students committed while using cohesive devices. The results of the study show that students used all types of cohesive devices in their paragraph even though the majority of the cohesive devices used (90.7 %) were grammatical in nature; students used lexical cohesive means to a small extent (9.3 %). Of the grammatical cohesive types, use reference and conjunction was common; substitution and ellipsis were infrequently used. The errors with regards to using cohesive devices were mainly with reference (70.3%), followed by conjunction (22.6%) and lexical means (7.1%). Interference between Vietnamese and English, students’ reported lack of knowledge of grammar, of cohesive devices, lack of vocabulary, and ‘carelessness could help explain these errors. The study provides some practical implications for teaching writing with regards to using cohesive devices.
Từ khóa tự do TA/PPGD/Phương pháp giảng dạy
Tác giả(bs) CN Nguyễn, Thị Bảo Trang
Địa chỉ 100Kho Luận án, luận văn(1): 000049536
000 00000nam#a2200000ui#4500
00121620
0024
0049D1D8A35-D2CA-4300-BEC9-054B2A366D5A
005202112261920
008081223s2021 vm| eng
0091 0
039|a20241119090434|bhuongttt|c20221222084731|dhuongttt|y20211226192200|zthuytt
040 |aHUCFL
041 |aENG
082 |a418.0071|bNGU
100 |aNguyễn, Quốc Tuấn
110 |aTrường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Huế
245 |aEXPLORING THE USE OF COHESIVE DEVICES IN PARAGRAPH WRITING BY PRE-INTERMEDIATE EFL STUDENTS AT SOME LANGUAGE CENTERS IN VIETNAM :|bKHÁM PHÁ CÁCH SỬ DỤNG PHƯƠNG TIỆN LIÊN KẾT TRONG VIẾT ĐOẠN VĂN BỞI HỌC VIÊN HỌC TIẾNG ANH NHƯ NGÔN NGỮ NƯỚC NGOÀI Ở CẤP ĐỘ TIỀN TRUNG CẤP Ở MỘT SỐ TRUNG TÂM TIẾNG ANH Ở VIỆT NAM /|cNguyễn Quốc Tuấn; Nguyễn Thị Bảo Trang
260 |aHuế,|c2021
300 |a90tr. ;|c28cm.
502 |aMA thesis in theory and methodology of english language teaching
520|aThis research explores Vietnamese ELF pre-intermediate students’ use of cohesive devices in paragraph writing and the problems students faced while using these devices. Eighty Vietnamese EFL learners in four English classes in two English centers in Vietnam each wrote five paragraphs about five different topics via learning blogs. In total, 400 paragraphs were collected. The analysis of this research was based of Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) cohesion taxonomy to identify cohesive devices students used and the problems in using these devices. Besides, the framework of error analysis by Ellis and Barkhuizen (2005) was also used to analyze the errors students committed while using cohesive devices. The results of the study show that students used all types of cohesive devices in their paragraph even though the majority of the cohesive devices used (90.7 %) were grammatical in nature; students used lexical cohesive means to a small extent (9.3 %). Of the grammatical cohesive types, use reference and conjunction was common; substitution and ellipsis were infrequently used. The errors with regards to using cohesive devices were mainly with reference (70.3%), followed by conjunction (22.6%) and lexical means (7.1%). Interference between Vietnamese and English, students’ reported lack of knowledge of grammar, of cohesive devices, lack of vocabulary, and ‘carelessness could help explain these errors. The study provides some practical implications for teaching writing with regards to using cohesive devices.
653 |aTA/PPGD/Phương pháp giảng dạy
691|a8140111
693|apdf
700 |aNguyễn, Thị Bảo Trang|eSupervisior
852|a100|bKho Luận án, luận văn|j(1): 000049536
890|c1|a1|b0|d49
Dòng Mã vạch Nơi lưu Chỉ số xếp giá Loại tài liệu Bản sao Tình trạng Thành phần Đặt mượn
1 000049536 Kho Luận án, luận văn 418.0071 NGU Đọc tại chỗ 1